Author: bobby palacios
Date: 23:16:03 01/08/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 09, 2003 at 01:17:24, David Rasmussen wrote: >On January 08, 2003 at 17:56:03, Christophe Theron wrote: > >>On January 08, 2003 at 14:27:13, Christopher A. Morgan wrote: >> >>> >>>Ruffian 1.0.1 very strong in blitz games v. Chess Tiger 14 >>> >>>More proof, not that it is needed, that Ruffian 1.0.1 is a very strong engine, >>>resulted from 90 blitz games, 5'+10" on Athlon 750, 112 MB hash between Chess >>>Tiger 14 and Ruffian 1.0.1. Overall result for 90 games, 45.5 - 44.5 in CT14's >>>favor. In decided games 26-25 in CT14's favor. >> >> >> >>Playing 5'+10'' is like giving a huge handicap to Tiger because its Fischer time >>management does not work properly. > >Then Tiger sucks. Aren't you the one that time and time again have stated that >an engine that is better at blitz than at standard or vice versa, sucks? Doesn't >the same apply here? > >/David Well, I remember I ran a 100 game test of ChessTiger 14 vs Ruffian 1.01 at game in 3 minutes on my pentium 2.4ghz, a while back when Ruffian 1.01 was hot and it ended quite convincingly 50-25 for CT14 before I stopped it, maybe Christophe has a point.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.