Author: David Rasmussen
Date: 00:59:44 01/09/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 09, 2003 at 02:16:03, bobby palacios wrote: > >Well, I remember I ran a 100 game test of ChessTiger 14 vs Ruffian 1.01 at game >in 3 minutes on my pentium 2.4ghz, a while back when Ruffian 1.01 was hot and it >ended quite convincingly 50-25 for CT14 before I stopped it, maybe Christophe >has a point. I'm sure he has, but it is an invalid point by his own standards. I wouldn't be surprised if Tiger is the better engine of the two. But using the excuse that the program performs bad at certain time controls (that are quite simple to implement), seems to me to be hypocritical given Christophe's earlier statements about other programs. /David
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.