Author: Uri Blass
Date: 02:44:00 01/09/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 09, 2003 at 05:09:58, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >On January 09, 2003 at 01:43:19, Russell Reagan wrote: > >>On January 09, 2003 at 01:11:51, Jouni Uski wrote: >> >>>Look: 60/5 played in old AMD 450 Mhz: >>> >>> 12345678901234567890 >>>1 SOS.3 for Arena ½½111½½½½1½½½1½00½11 12.5/20 >>>2 Ruffian 1.0.1 ½½000½½½½0½½½0½11½00 7.5/20 >>> >>>Ruffi scores first win in game 16 - that can't be totally by chance?! >>> >>>Jouni >> >>I am running some games at the same time control you used. So far SOS is out >>searching Ruffian by 1-3 ply on every move (impressive). I'll post the results >>when this set of games is finished. > >What do you mean by "outsearching" (is it displaying a higher value, called >"depth") ? > >I guess that nobody is able to outsearch Ruffian by 3 plies. >The depth is usually a number counting the iterations. It contains no >information about the search trees which are being inspected. It's a more or >less useless number. > >A program displaying depth=6 may be following many lines deeper than another >program displaying depth=9. > >Uli I agree The depth that is displayed means nothing when the program use different pruning and extensions. I will be more impressed if Sos can see fail high or fail low for tactical reasons 2 times faster. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.