Author: Uri Blass
Date: 07:58:48 01/09/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 09, 2003 at 10:25:36, Thorsten Czub wrote: >you don't understand. tiger 14 or 15 are very good at blitz. >and therefore tiger does not "suck". >there is a bug in the engine, that is not handling fischer time control >accurate. > >if you would have played 3' blitz or 5' blitz WITHOUT fischer bonus >than the result would have been better (for tiger14/15). > >i wonder why you don't use tiger15. >tiger 14 is the old program. The original poster(christopher morgan) used tiger14 and reported results. David only responded and I do not know if have one of the tigers. My opinion is that it is not fair to use the words of christophe about another thing against christophe. Christophe was talking about engines that are only good at long time control when now we are talking about an engine that is only good at time control that is not fisher time control. I also believe that one of the weaknesses of Ruffian is bad time management and testers of the ssdf already reported that Ruffian often does not use significant part of it's time in 120/40 games. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.