Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:09:11 01/09/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 09, 2003 at 14:02:58, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 09, 2003 at 13:25:29, James T. Walker wrote: > >>On January 09, 2003 at 06:40:25, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On January 09, 2003 at 06:14:12, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >>> >>>>I have seen some other tournaments with not so impressive results for List 5.04 >>>> >>>> >>>>2St./40Z. + 1St. KO, PIII 800Mhz, 256Mb, Fritz 8 GUI, >>>>Hashtables 64Mb, Tablebases Fritz Endgame Turbo >>>> >>>>1 Fritz 8 10 10 ?1 11 11 7.5 / 10 >>>>2 Shredder 7 01 10 10 ?1 11 6.5 / 10 >>>>3 Ruffian 1.0.1 01 01 01 11 10 6.0 / 10 >>>>4 Chess Tiger 14.0 ?0 01 10 10 ?1 5.0 / 10 >>>>5 Junior 7 00 ?0 00 01 11 3.5 / 10 >>>>6 List 5.04 00 00 01 ?0 00 1.5 / 10 >>>> >>>>I don?t believe that List can compare with Ruffian. >>>> >>>>Greetings >>>> >>>>TL >>> >>>Based on your result direct comparison between list and ruffian when you ignore >>>other players give 1-1 >>> >>>Uri >> >>And that proves exactly nothing. >>Jim > >This suggest that maybe list can do relatively better against Ruffian in a >direct match. > >It is not a proof but I remember good result of list against ruffian from a >previous post. > >Uri Maybe I confused between list and sos but still the sentence was "I don?t believe that List can compare with Ruffian" maybe I do not understand the sentence but I thought about direct match when I read the word compare and the result strongly suggest that ruffian is a better program but suggest nothing about the result of a match between list and ruffian. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.