Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Ruffian 1.0.1 very strong in blitz games v. Chess Tiger 14

Author: Thorsten Czub

Date: 15:15:41 01/09/03

Go up one level in this thread

On January 09, 2003 at 15:40:29, David Rasmussen wrote:
>Have I suggested that?
>
>/David

YOU suggested:


>Playing 5'+10'' is like giving a huge handicap to Tiger because its Fischer time
>management does not work properly.

Then Tiger sucks. Aren't you the one that time and time again have stated that
an engine that is better at blitz than at standard or vice versa, sucks? Doesn't
the same apply here?

/David

that tiger SUCKS because someone let it run in a buggy time control.

tiger would play good in blitz, standard or even in fischer,
IF the bug would be repaired.

so tiger does not suck.

the tester who tests it in a broken mode sucks.

• Re: Ruffian 1.0.1 very strong in blitz games v. Chess Tiger 14 Mogens Larsen 16:05:34 01/09/03
  • Re: Ruffian 1.0.1 very strong in blitz games v. Chess Tiger 14 David Rasmussen 02:00:39 01/10/03
    • Re: Ruffian 1.0.1 very strong in blitz games v. Chess Tiger 14 Christophe Theron 06:38:52 01/10/03
      • Re: Ruffian 1.0.1 very strong in blitz games v. Chess Tiger 14 Uri Blass 07:02:13 01/10/03
    • Re: Ruffian 1.0.1 very strong in blitz games v. Chess Tiger 14 Thorsten Czub 02:24:33 01/10/03
      • Re: Ruffian 1.0.1 very strong in blitz games v. Chess Tiger 14 David Rasmussen 04:15:46 01/10/03
        • Re: Ruffian 1.0.1 very strong in blitz games v. Chess Tiger 14 Thorsten Czub 05:34:06 01/10/03
  • Re: Ruffian 1.0.1 very strong in blitz games v. Chess Tiger 14 Christophe Theron 16:32:50 01/09/03

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.