Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 16:26:31 01/09/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 09, 2003 at 01:17:24, David Rasmussen wrote:
>On January 08, 2003 at 17:56:03, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>On January 08, 2003 at 14:27:13, Christopher A. Morgan wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Ruffian 1.0.1 very strong in blitz games v. Chess Tiger 14
>>>
>>>More proof, not that it is needed, that Ruffian 1.0.1 is a very strong engine,
>>>resulted from 90 blitz games, 5'+10" on Athlon 750, 112 MB hash between Chess
>>>Tiger 14 and Ruffian 1.0.1. Overall result for 90 games, 45.5 - 44.5 in CT14's
>>>favor. In decided games 26-25 in CT14's favor.
>>
>>
>>
>>Playing 5'+10'' is like giving a huge handicap to Tiger because its Fischer time
>>management does not work properly.
>
>Then Tiger sucks. Aren't you the one that time and time again have stated that
>an engine that is better at blitz than at standard or vice versa, sucks? Doesn't
>the same apply here?
>
>/David
It's not what I said, but if that can make you happy then yes, Chess Tiger
sucks.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.