Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 16:36:24 01/09/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 09, 2003 at 17:43:42, enrico carrisco wrote:
>On January 08, 2003 at 17:56:03, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>On January 08, 2003 at 14:27:13, Christopher A. Morgan wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Ruffian 1.0.1 very strong in blitz games v. Chess Tiger 14
>>>
>>>More proof, not that it is needed, that Ruffian 1.0.1 is a very strong engine,
>>>resulted from 90 blitz games, 5'+10" on Athlon 750, 112 MB hash between Chess
>>>Tiger 14 and Ruffian 1.0.1. Overall result for 90 games, 45.5 - 44.5 in CT14's
>>>favor. In decided games 26-25 in CT14's favor.
>>
>>
>>
>>Playing 5'+10'' is like giving a huge handicap to Tiger because its Fischer time
>>management does not work properly.
>>
>>Play games with no time increment if you want to see the real thing.
>>
>>
>>
>> Christophe
>>
>
>Hello Christophe,
>
>Was this problem solved in the ChessTiger 15 engine?
>
>Also, was the time management problem strictly in the ChessBase engine release
>or also with ChessPartner (regular) package? I've heard this discussed before
>but never in detail -- perhaps I missed the thread.
>
>-elc.
The time management has not been fixed in Tiger 15.
All versions (ChessBase, Lokasoft and ChessAssistant) suffer from the same
problem.
Even the Palm version has the same problem, but you cannot see it because the
PalmOS GUI does not offer Fisher time controls! :)
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.