Author: enrico carrisco
Date: 23:12:23 01/09/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 09, 2003 at 19:26:31, Christophe Theron wrote: >On January 09, 2003 at 01:17:24, David Rasmussen wrote: > >>On January 08, 2003 at 17:56:03, Christophe Theron wrote: >> >>>On January 08, 2003 at 14:27:13, Christopher A. Morgan wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>Ruffian 1.0.1 very strong in blitz games v. Chess Tiger 14 >>>> >>>>More proof, not that it is needed, that Ruffian 1.0.1 is a very strong engine, >>>>resulted from 90 blitz games, 5'+10" on Athlon 750, 112 MB hash between Chess >>>>Tiger 14 and Ruffian 1.0.1. Overall result for 90 games, 45.5 - 44.5 in CT14's >>>>favor. In decided games 26-25 in CT14's favor. >>> >>> >>> >>>Playing 5'+10'' is like giving a huge handicap to Tiger because its Fischer time >>>management does not work properly. >> >>Then Tiger sucks. Aren't you the one that time and time again have stated that >>an engine that is better at blitz than at standard or vice versa, sucks? Doesn't >>the same apply here? >> >>/David > > > >It's not what I said, but if that can make you happy then yes, Chess Tiger >sucks. > If that's the case then Fritz stinks and everything else blows.. ;) -elc.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.