Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Thanks: Generalised Leapers then ...

Author: Omid David Tabibi

Date: 01:14:58 01/10/03

Go up one level in this thread


On January 10, 2003 at 03:36:01, GuyHaworth wrote:

>
>... if the position need not be legal, you could:
>
>a)  replace the 'Knight' in my last reply by a 'Generalised Leaper'
>    a GL makes a 1-N move where N is not defined
>
>b)  make the board bigger
>
>... so obviously, I think you need some definition of 'legal' to make your
>question meaningful.
>
>Why not assume 8x8, standard Western Chess

BTW, I noticed that Chess is referred to as Western Chess in ICGA website. The
current chess we play is anything but western. Why not use something like
International Chess, or an even better alternative: Chess!


>pieces (as of now), stm not in check
>and that the type of force on the board is credible.
>
>g



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.