Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Ruffian 1.0.1 very strong in blitz games v. Chess Tiger 14

Author: David Rasmussen

Date: 02:00:39 01/10/03

Go up one level in this thread

On January 09, 2003 at 19:05:34, Mogens Larsen wrote:

>
>By the same argument, you could say that anyone should avoid testing engines in
>environments where they are likely to suck. If an engine is poor at blitz, it
>shouldn't be tested at blitz timecontrols. Likewise with any other imaginable
>parameter. Otherwise the tester obviously suck.
>
>If there's a bug, it should be fixed. If the bug causes inferior performance.
>Too bad.
>

Exactly.

EOD. I don't want to go to the strange and unknown place that is the weird
logics of Thorsten.

/David

• Re: Ruffian 1.0.1 very strong in blitz games v. Chess Tiger 14 Christophe Theron 06:38:52 01/10/03
  • Re: Ruffian 1.0.1 very strong in blitz games v. Chess Tiger 14 Uri Blass 07:02:13 01/10/03
• Re: Ruffian 1.0.1 very strong in blitz games v. Chess Tiger 14 Thorsten Czub 02:24:33 01/10/03
  • Re: Ruffian 1.0.1 very strong in blitz games v. Chess Tiger 14 David Rasmussen 04:15:46 01/10/03
    • Re: Ruffian 1.0.1 very strong in blitz games v. Chess Tiger 14 Thorsten Czub 05:34:06 01/10/03

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.