Author: Eduard Nemeth
Date: 05:10:14 01/10/03
Internet Translate:
When the CSS of on-line masters loose-went (on the ChessBase server), watched I
for the first time, as the 2. Game between Deep junior 7 and Guenes/Fritz 8 was
played. The evaluations came literally estimated themselves to a packing game
in that. Not even the position could compute the best programs correctly.
Toward end of the portion then Deep saw itself junior 7 first clearly in the
plus, later however saw it only a Remis by continuous chess however on different
fields. Fritz 8 had only few minutes on the clock, therefore I said in the Chat
to the operator of Dj7 he was further-play, with the note that Fritz 8 on time
to lose could. But the players suddenly agreed on Remis, which surprised me
somewhat. Only on the next day I experienced however that Fritz 8 in normally
the mode do not play separate its operator control timing + book. Also I
experienced that even during exceeding the time the portion is measured - if
thus a technical Remis is not present in such a way applies exceeding the time!
From therefore it the Remisangebot of Dj7, and for me likewise, but only one day
was understandable later, unfortunately.
Yesterday it came to a similar position on the server - to be over exact, it was
still clearer than the position between Dj7 and Fritz 8. The only difference:
it concerned to nothing all or, and with a Remis the laughter would have been 3.
At the board was a TBs draw position between Guenes/Fritz8 and Gambit tiger
2.0. Fritz 8 had still 3 minutes during Gambit tiger still about 13 minutes on
the clock had. Here the notation in PGN:
[Event "60m + 15s, unrated rapid "]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2003.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "XErdoG_Fritz8"]
[Black "XMarekBa_GTiger,Gambit Tiger 2.0"]
[ECO "B10"]
[Result "1-0"]
1. e4 {71} c6 {0} 2. Nc3 {5} d5 {0} 3. d3 {5} g6 {0} 4. g3
{13} Bg7 {0} 5. Bg2 {14} Nf6 {0} 6. e5 {4} Ng4 {0} 7. f4
{7} f6 {0} 8. Nf3 {14} fxe5 {0} 9. h3 {5} Nh6 {0} 10. fxe5
{9} Nf7 {0} 11. Qe2 {6} d4 {0} 12. Ne4 {6} Nxe5 {0}
13. Nxe5 {4} Bxe5 {0} 14. O-O {6} Qc7 {0} 15. Bh6 {6} Bf5
{0} 16. Rxf5 {9} gxf5 {1.54/16 106} 17. Qh5+ {13} Kd8
{1.52/17 97} 18. Nc5 {145} Qc8 {1.08/16 262} 19. Re1 {521}
Bxg3 {0.98/15 285} 20. Ne6+ {68} Kd7 {0.32/15 246} 21. Re2
{97} Qe8 {0.46/13 0} 22. Qxf5 {107} Kc8 {0.56/14 161}
23. Ng7+ {29} Qd7 {-0.28/16 56} 24. Rxe7 {88} Qxf5
{-0.34/17 21} 25. Nxf5 {58} Bc7 {0.62/16 137} 26. Bf3 {105}
Na6 {0.98/16 464} 27. Nxd4 {6} Nb4 {0.42/13 61} 28. Kf1
{243} a5 {0.76/16 218} 29. a3 {6} Nd5 {0.66/15 65} 30. Rf7
{160} Be5 {0.70/15 12} 31. Ne6 {135} Bd6 {0.78/15 128}
32. c4 {40} Nc7 {1.10/15 36} 33. Nf8 {174} Bxf8 {1.34/16
183} 34. Bxf8 {106} h5 {1.70/18 70} 35. Bd6 {160} Ne6
{1.48/17 0} 36. Be4 {121} Rd8 {1.40/15 0} 37. Be7 {114} Rd4
{1.60/15 0} 38. c5 {109} b6 {1.04/15 57} 39. cxb6 {201} Rb8
{1.02/16 0} 40. Kg1 {404} Rxe4 {0.92/16 38} 41. dxe4 {7}
Rxb6 {1.58/16 48} 42. b4 {50} Rb5 {1.54/14 8} 43. Kf2 {85}
c5 {1.64/16 64} 44. bxc5 {46} Nxc5 {1.52/14 43} 45. Bxc5
{95} Rxc5 {1.44/16 1} 46. h4 {187} a4 {1.08/15 163} 47. Rf5
{130} Rc3 {0.94/15 105} 48. Rxh5 {70} Rxa3 {0.95/14 120}
49. Ra5 {8} Kd7 {1.22/13 106} 50. h5 {35} Ke7 {1.24/11 0}
51. h6 {42} Rh3 {1.00/12 68} 52. Ra6 {54} Kf7 {1.06/14 50}
53. Kg2 {34} Rh4 {0.54/13 50} 54. Kf3 {54} a3 {0.00/12 55}
55. e5 {23} a2 {0.00/12 30} 56. Rxa2 {46} Rxh6 {0.00/12 8}
57. Ra7+ {11} Ke8 {0.00/1 0} 58. Ke4 {7} Rh2 {0.00/1 0}
59. Rb7 {21} Re2+ {0.00/1 0} 60. Kd5 {14} Rd2+ {0.00/1 0}
61. Ke6 {25} Kd8 {0.00/1 0} 62. Rb8+ {26} Kc7 {0.00/1 0}
63. Rh8 {24} Re2 {0.00/1 0} 64. Re8 {XErdoG_Fritz8 claims
flag (automatic). (Lag: Av=0.25s, max=0.4s) 26} 1-0
after that 64 moves of white the passed then following: Suddenly Gambit tiger
did not pull, we waited some minutes however nothing did. I looked myself then
in the hall over, however, Gambit tiger 2,0 "saw no" XMarekBa_GTiger there. It
was thus no more in the hall. Probably its PC fell. While the time for black
ran off, white automatically therefore first the valuation 1-0 lodged a
complaint on victory for itself. After it the operator of Gambit tiger in the
hall emerged sometime again, and looked for his opponent. But it came too late,
those game was terminated. Now the arbitrators had to decide. The operator of
Fritz 8 pounded on it that either is further-played or that the victory was to
be awarded to him. Despite repeated references of two arbitrators that here
because of exceeding the time the portion must be measured as Remis
(TBs-5-Steiner) loud ยง 14: Technical clear profit /Remisstellungen as per
Tablesbases Gewonnen/Remis given, also with time delay, refused white first
accepting the Remis and which although it should know the rule, because it
functions with masters likewise as an arbitrator, except with own portions.
There were many kiebitze, and the operators of REBEL (the laughing 3.) in the
Chat, likewise the operator of cunning because of this unreasonable controversy
from the tournament even so it wanted to withdraw. Then simply to "night" said
the fair arbitrators decided then on Remis and one property - because it the
interpretation of the rule was than clear more.
Have so does computer chess a game of a friendship tournament to end? If all
behaved in such a way "fairplay" like it the Dj7-Bediener in the mentioned 2.
game against Fritz 8 did not do, surely!
My original german message here:
http://www.beepworld.de/members37/computerschach/kommentar.htm
Eduard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.