Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Ruffian 1.0.1 very strong in blitz games v. Chess Tiger 14

Author: Christophe Theron

Date: 06:26:45 01/10/03

Go up one level in this thread


On January 10, 2003 at 07:05:55, David Rasmussen wrote:

>On January 09, 2003 at 19:26:31, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>>
>>>Then Tiger sucks. Aren't you the one that time and time again have stated that
>>>an engine that is better at blitz than at standard or vice versa, sucks? Doesn't
>>>the same apply here?
>>>
>>>/David
>>
>>
>>
>>It's not what I said, but if that can make you happy then yes, Chess Tiger
>>sucks.
>>
>>
>
>Then what did you say? I'm not saying it sucks, in fact I don't care about
>Tiger. I am saying that by your own logic, it sucks.
>
>/David



Read the archives to find out what I said. But I don't understand why you care
so much about what I said if you don't care about Tiger.

Oh well...



    Christophe



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.