Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: What are Fritz, Chessmaster, Rebel, Tiger, etc saying about this? (NT)

Author: Drexel,Michael

Date: 14:13:50 01/11/03

Go up one level in this thread


On January 11, 2003 at 16:27:08, Lieven Clarisse wrote:

>
>
>On January 11, 2003 at 08:31:44, Lieven Clarisse wrote:
>
>>This is most probably a well known position (pasted below). But ruffian resigns
>>here (5 min/game PIII 450 64MB hash). I think this kind of situation can be
>>easily dealt with: if the evaluation score for the initial position is equal to
>>that, after 25 ply (for instance) for the best line, than the score for that
>>position should set to 0.00. In other words, if the engine can't make any
>>progress after a certain number of moves, it is draw; no mather how inbalanced
>>the material is for both sides.
>>
>>
>>[D] 7k/8/1p1p1p1p/pPpPpPpP/P1P1P1P1/8/1RK5/1R6 b - - 0 1

probably none of them is able to find a draw here.
actually I have tested it with Ruffian, Fritz 8 and Shredder 7.
Ruffian searched pretty fast up to depth 64 but unfortunatley he stopped
searching completly at this depth. this seems pretty useless to me and I hope he
will search to depth 100 in the next version.


I have set up a slightly more realistic example and we had already the
testposition with Qeen on b6 some weeks ago.

[D] 8/k2n4/1p1p1p2/p1pPpPp1/P1P3Pp/7P/1RK5/1R6 b - - 0 1

if any program will ever be able to detect such positions without drawbacks
it would defend closed worse positions much better and would gain reasonable
strength.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.