Author: Matt Taylor
Date: 17:22:04 01/11/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 10, 2003 at 17:21:41, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On January 09, 2003 at 07:35:41, Mark Schreiber wrote: > >>On January 08, 2003 at 20:23:18, Terry McCracken wrote: >> >>>On January 08, 2003 at 19:56:58, Michael Vox wrote: >>> >>>>Strangley, by the end of the day, both of the stocks had declined. Meaning that >>>>potential investors do not foresee earning potential in the deal :( >>> >>>People can be dumb, can't they? >>> >>>I think it will be something to watch. I'm watching:o) >>> >>>Terry >> >>That’s because people have learned from history. IBM partners with other >>companies because they can not develop high technology on its own. IBM supplies >>the money; the other company does the work. They have tried this before. It >>always fails miserably. They tried it with Siemens to make phone systems. With >>Apple and HP to get a GUI OS. Motorola for CPU’s. Toshiba for memory chips. >>Don’t expect any high technology products to come from this. >>Mark > > >IBM can't "develop high technology on its own"??? > >:) > >History sure doesn't support that... Nor current events. It has been a little while since I looked into it, but last I checked IBM held the world's largest (and most coherent) quantum computer. -Matt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.