Author: ALI MIRAFZALI
Date: 23:36:32 01/12/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 13, 2003 at 00:01:35, Terry McCracken wrote: >On January 12, 2003 at 22:58:22, Carlos Lantigua wrote: > >>What do you think is stronger (or was in deeper blue case) >> >>Kasparov ovboiously says is deeper blue and Kramnik says deep fritz. > >It's obvious this question can't be answered scientifically. > >The only way to be certain, is play Deep Fritz against Deep Blue, >and of course that will _never_ happen. > >However, IMHO, Deep Blue is stronger, by 100 rating points! > >BTW if Kasparov says Deep Blue is stronger, I'd trust his opinion >over a publicity match played by Kramnik, even though Kasparov lost. > >Moreover, I watched both matches, and it seems clear to me Deep Blue played >better chess, but it was running on a supercomputer many many times faster >than Deep Fritz. If Deep Fritz was adapted to play on such hardware then I >would suspect, Deep Fritz would be stronger. > >But again I stress, the _only_ way to prove this beyond any doubt is to play >Deep Fritz against Deep Blue, since this isn't going to happen, this arguement >is really moot. > >Terry Wow.Deep Fritz Deep Blue.100 rating points.I wonder where all this Knowledge comes from.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.