Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 02:16:49 01/13/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 13, 2003 at 02:36:32, ALI MIRAFZALI wrote: >On January 13, 2003 at 00:01:35, Terry McCracken wrote: > >>On January 12, 2003 at 22:58:22, Carlos Lantigua wrote: >> >>>What do you think is stronger (or was in deeper blue case) >>> >>>Kasparov ovboiously says is deeper blue and Kramnik says deep fritz. >> >>It's obvious this question can't be answered scientifically. >> >>The only way to be certain, is play Deep Fritz against Deep Blue, >>and of course that will _never_ happen. >> >>However, IMHO, Deep Blue is stronger, by 100 rating points! >> >>BTW if Kasparov says Deep Blue is stronger, I'd trust his opinion >>over a publicity match played by Kramnik, even though Kasparov lost. >> >>Moreover, I watched both matches, and it seems clear to me Deep Blue played >>better chess, but it was running on a supercomputer many many times faster >>than Deep Fritz. If Deep Fritz was adapted to play on such hardware then I >>would suspect, Deep Fritz would be stronger. >> >>But again I stress, the _only_ way to prove this beyond any doubt is to play >>Deep Fritz against Deep Blue, since this isn't going to happen, this arguement >>is really moot. >> >>Terry >Wow.Deep Fritz Deep Blue.100 rating points.I wonder where all this Knowledge >comes from. Unlike you, I do possess knowledge, intelligence, and as a rule good manners. Please troll someplace else.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.