Author: Rémi Coulom
Date: 02:32:13 01/13/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 12, 2003 at 17:14:18, Bas Hamstra wrote: >I am playing with a 0x88 implementation, that is supposed to be faster than my >rotated BitBoard program. Just for fun. However I am a little disappointed I use 0x88 in TCB. 0x88 should be faster than bitboards for basic operations. TCB is 30-40% faster than crafty on perft (with a perft implementation similar to Crafty's). Your code looks very far from optimal. I plan to make my source publicly available soon, so people can take a look at how I do it. Rémi
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.