Author: stuart taylor
Date: 04:02:58 01/13/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 13, 2003 at 04:04:26, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 12, 2003 at 23:55:05, Joshua Haglund wrote: > >>On January 12, 2003 at 22:58:22, Carlos Lantigua wrote: >> >>>What do you think is stronger (or was in deeper blue case) >>> >>>Kasparov ovboiously says is deeper blue and Kramnik says deep fritz. >> >>Deep Blue is stronger as far as I can see. Deep Blue is far better than Fritz. >> >>With or without learning... > >I do not see how can you see it. > >There is no evidence that deeper blue was better in tactics because there >is no impressive good move that top programs need hours to find. > >It is natural to suspect that the player who stopped to play has something to >hide >It has nothing to do with the behaviour of kasparov after the match because >Deeper Blue could play in other tournaments and if Deeper blue was better than >the programs of today then it means that they could win almost every WCCC. > >People remember that deep blue lost against Fritz3(it was only deep blue >prototype but it does not change the impression) > >If they were really better they could probably correct that impression by >scoring 100% or even only 90% in the next WCCC and the only reason that I >understand not to do it is in case that they are not sure almost in 100% that >they can do it. > >Uri I agree with all what you say 100%! S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.