Author: Uri Blass
Date: 14:08:28 01/13/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 13, 2003 at 16:26:49, Sune Fischer wrote:
>On January 13, 2003 at 15:13:49, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>It seems based on that game that Movei still does not kibitz correctly
>>under ICC because I could not see comments to that game but here is the game
>>
>>Based on the notes Ruffian had better hardware (1200Mhz against 1000Mhz of
>>Movei.
>>
>>It is the first game that Movei does not win on ICC
>>
>>[Event "ICS rated blitz match"]
>>[Site "chessclub.com"]
>>[Date "2003.01.13"]
>>[Round "-"]
>>[White "PeZao"]
>>[Black "MoveiXX"]
>>[Result "1/2-1/2"]
>>[WhiteElo "2696"]
>>[BlackElo "2612"]
>>[TimeControl "180"]
>>
>>1. Nf3 Nf6 2. g3 d5 3. Bg2 Nc6 4. d3 Bg4 5. Nbd2 e5 6. e4 Bc5 7. h3 dxe4 8.
>>hxg4 exf3 9. Bxf3 Nd5 10. a3 O-O 11. g5 g6 12. c4 Nb6 13. Bxc6 bxc6 14. Ne4
>>Be7 15. Be3 Re8 16. b3 Qc8 17. Qf3 Rb8 18. Rh6 Nd7 19. Rxh7 f6 20. Qh1 Nf8
>>21. Rh8+ Kf7 22. gxf6 Bxf6 23. Nxf6 Kxf6 24. b4 Qf5 25. Bxa7 Qxd3 26. Bxb8
>>Qc3+ 27. Ke2 Qxc4+ 28. Kd2 Rd8+ 29. Ke1 Qc3+ 30. Ke2 Qd3+ 31. Ke1 Qc3+ 32.
>>Ke2 Qd3+ 33. Ke1 Qc3+
>>{Game drawn by repetition} 1/2-1/2
>>
>>Uri
>
>Are you sure it is Ruffian?
>It's rating seems a bit low, for a ruffian class engine I mean.
>
>[Event "ICC 3 0"]
>[Site "Internet Chess Club"]
>[Date "2003.01.13"]
>[Round "-"]
>[White "Frenzee"]
>[Black "PeZao"]
>[Result "1/2-1/2"]
>[ICCResult "Game drawn because neither player has mating material"]
>[WhiteElo "2460"]
>[BlackElo "2677"]
>[Opening "King's Indian: Four pawns attack, dynamic line"]
>[ECO "E76"]
>[NIC "KI.55"]
>[Time "10:28:19"]
>[TimeControl "180+0"]
>
>1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. f4 c5 6. d5 O-O 7. Nf3 b5 8. cxb5
>a6 9. e5 dxe5 10. Nxe5 Bb7 11. Bc4 axb5 12. Bxb5 Nxd5 13. Nxd5 Bxd5 14. O-O
>Rxa2 15. Rxa2 Bxa2 16. Be3 Qb6 17. Qa4 Bd5 18. Rd1 Qe6 19. Bc4 Bxc4 20. Qxc4
>Qxc4 21. Nxc4 Bd4 22. Bxd4 Rd8 23. Re1 Rxd4 24. Rxe7 Rxc4 25. Re8+ Kg7 26.
>Rxb8 Rxf4 27. Rb5 Rb4 28. Rxc5 Rxb2 29. Rc7 Kf6 30. Rc6+ Ke5 31. Ra6 f6 32.
>Ra5+ Kf4 33. Ra4+ Kf5 34. Ra5+ Kg4 35. Ra4+ Kh5 36. Ra7 h6 37. Rc7 Kg5 38.
>Kf1 h5 39. Rc4 Kf5 40. Rc7 h4 41. Kg1 Kf4 42. Rc4+ Ke3 43. h3 g5 44. Rc5 Ke4
>45. Rc4+ Ke5 46. Rc5+ Kd6 47. Rc8 Kd7 48. Rg8 Ke6 49. Rg7 Kf5 50. Rc7 Ra2
>51. Rc8 Ke4 52. Rc4+ Ke3 53. Rc3+ Kf4 54. Rf3+ Ke5 55. Re3+ Kf5 56. Rb3 Rd2
>57. Rb7 Kf4 58. Rb4+ Ke3 59. Rb5 Ke4 60. Rb8 f5 61. Re8+ Kf4 62. Rf8 Kg3 63.
>Rxf5 Rxg2+ 64. Kh1 Kxh3 65. Rxg5 Rh2+ 66. Kg1 Re2 67. Rg7 Re1+ 68. Kf2 Rd1
>69. Rh7 Rc1 70. Rh8 Rb1 71. Rh7 Rd1 72. Rh8 Rc1 73. Rh7 Rb1 74. Rh8 Rh1 75.
>Rg8 Ra1 76. Rh8 Ra2+ 77. Kg1 Rg2+ 78. Kh1 Rh2+ 79. Kg1 Rd2 80. Rf8 Rg2+ 81.
>Kh1 Rh2+ 82. Kg1 Re2 83. Rf3+ Kg4 84. Rf2 Rxf2 85. Kxf2 Kh3 86. Kf3 Kh2 87.
>Kf2 h3 88. Kf1 Kg3 89. Kg1 Kf3 90. Kh1 Kf4 91. Kh2 Kg4 92. Kg1 Kg5 93. Kf1
>Kf5 94. Kf2 Kf4 95. Kg1 Kg4 96. Kh1 Kg5 97. Kg1 Kh5 98. Kf2 Kh4 99. Kf3 h2
>100. Kg2 h1=B+ {Game drawn because neither player has mating material}
>1/2-1/2
You may be right
I do not know but I read ruffian in the notes of it.
I did not check what is the rating of the best programs in similiar hardware.
Maybe other people can check the 2 games to see if the moves are ruffian's moves
because I am too lazy to do it.
Uri
Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.