Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Which one was stronger Deeper Blue or ..........

Author: Terry McCracken

Date: 19:06:44 01/13/03

Go up one level in this thread


On January 13, 2003 at 19:08:23, stuart taylor wrote:

>Let's get it over with already, (all this DB worship)!
>I'm sure we can already say that whichever comes at the top of the ssdf (When
>Deep junior/Junior 8 gets tested, and with necesary correction patches), and if
>you put that program on the best, but regular hardware, I think we can well
>assume it has gone a bit over the DB which embarrassed Kasparov.
>I think we can finally safely assume that this multi-million dollar enterprise
>which made headlines everywhere, is already exceeded with our bedroom (or living
>room) furniture. It was normally 2 years between top existing machine, and level
>of what is commercially available. This will now be a clean 6 years.
> How much more can we dream?!
>
>I think that it's safe to say that top commercial computer chess strength has
>absolutely outclassed itself atleast twice since then. We have gone from Hiarcs
>6 on 266 Mhz. to Fritz 8 on about 2.7 Ghz. I really don't think that deeper blue
>would pose any real threat today. OK, it might be very near the top, maybe
>second or third, and might stay around there for a couple more years due to its
>speed challenge. But what we have now, overall, is surely better.
>S.Taylor

Where's your data to support your claims?
Stuart, you haven't a clue what you're talking about, and you know it...or you
should!

Without concrete data, you're talking through your hat.

Terry



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.