Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 04:18:37 01/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 13, 2003 at 14:48:47, Dieter Buerssner wrote: >On January 13, 2003 at 13:16:33, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >>This post has some good stuff, but some of it is soul-selling stuff. >> >>I am opposed to making "white" and "black" functions, because it is difficult to >>keep them current. Invariably, something is missed and one of the functions has >>a bug. > >I agree, Bruce. Actually, I wanted to add a comment, like the one you did above. > >>If this is going to be done, it should be done by including a file twice, but >>that is also satanic. > >I wouldn't call it satanic. It might be easy (to maintain). Anyway, without some >"trick" that can use exactly the same code twice, I would not do it. Especially >in this case, I would guess, that there is very little gain. May I recommend using an integer (non-type) template argument? Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.