Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:15:23 01/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 14, 2003 at 08:14:31, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 14, 2003 at 07:01:28, Drexel,Michael wrote: > >>On January 14, 2003 at 01:00:30, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On January 14, 2003 at 00:44:16, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On January 14, 2003 at 00:10:13, K. Burcham wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>Eduard, Deep Junior7 plays 12.a4. >>>>>also notice 12.a4 in both deep fritz and deep shredder. >>>>>another Deep Blue move that todays top programs will play. >>>>> >>>>>kburcham >>>> >>>>Better look at your output again. Only DJ7 plays a4. Not that this >>>>is a particularly good test position. >>>> >>>>Deep Fritz 7 likes Re1, not a4. As does Deep Shredder. >>> >>>I think that he meant to 13.a4 in the pv of deep fritz7 and deep shredder that >>>suggest the same plan. >>> >>>I think that kasparov made mistakes later in the game >>> >>>I am not sure if 12.a4 is a winner and at least kasparov made tactical mistakes >>>later because I believe that it is not an easy win for white. >>> >>>It may be interesting to see the analysis of programs some moves later. >>> >>>Uri >> >>How should one defend this position against Deep Blue? >>John Nunn wrote after 11...b5: >>A new move, but not one which will resurrect this variation. A few examples >>should demonstrate the true horror of Black's situation. >>The idea of Kasparov's move is to secure the d5-square for his knight against >>the thrust c2-c4. However, it gives White the chance to open new lines on the >>queenside and bring his a1-rook into play without loss of time. Moreover, it >>fails to deal with the main problem of Black's position - his inability to move >>his queen. The only square available to her is b4, but this not only leaves the >>e6-pawn undefended, it also allows White to gain time by chasing the queen. >> >>Kaparov had lost interest in the game. He knew match is lost. > >It may be interesting to see if this position is a sure win for white in a >comp-comp games(120/40). > >I prefer to use computer time for other things but maybe other people with >faster hardware can do it. > >I do not claim to understand the position well enough to be sure about the >theoretical result. > >Uri I mean theoretical result assuming perfect play. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.