Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: ahh, but we're talking about blitz, not standard

Author: Peter Kappler

Date: 13:46:43 01/14/03

On January 14, 2003 at 16:34:21, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:

>On January 14, 2003 at 14:57:38, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>tatistics for Diepeveen(FM)         On for:    0     Idle:    0
>
>          rating [need] win  loss  draw total   best
>Wild        1701  [6]   176   219    26   421   1961 (28-Apr-1998)
>Loser's     1526  [6]     0     9     0     9
>Bughouse    1582  [6]     4    13     0    17
>Crazyhouse  1593  [6]     8     4     0    12
>Bullet      2139  [8]   766   710    79  1555   2429 (14-Jul-1998)
>Blitz       2419       1128  1265   226  2619   2626 (09-Jan-2001)
>Standard    2455         39    31    11    81   2471 (10-Jun-2002)
>5-minute    2233  [4]   237   167    41   445   2305 (18-Nov-2002)
>1-minute    1883        305   266    28   599   2145 (01-Oct-2002)
>
>See my standard rating at icc 2455. It's same level like current crafty. Not to
>mention 1997.


Nice try, Vincent.

Quoting from  http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?276733

  "In 1997 i won easily in blitz from all programs. They knew nothing.
   Bad evaluation. Very passive play. Small search depths."


So, I wish you good luck in your blitz match with Crafty.  I can't wait to
watch.  Maybe you can play the games between rounds at CCT5 this weekend. :)

-Peter




>
>I play standard games at like 5 AM in the night also... ...otherwise it would be
>2600+ :)
>
>After paderborn 2003 i have time perhaps again to care for your statement.
>
>You *only* ran on a single cpu pro200 in 1997.
>
>The *worldchamps* 1997 you had an alpha, my memory serves me bad here, wasn't
>that the 500Mhz alpha 21164 from Bruce, or did Shredder ran onto that one?
>
>>I'm still waiting.  Vincent, you claimed "you could easily beat a 1997 program
>>on 1997
>>hardware."  I have a 1997 program and 1997 hardware waiting for you to prove
>>that
>>statement on.
>>
>>I have mentioned this more than once after you made the outrageous claim.  You
>>have
>>_never_ responded.
>>
>>Is this another case of "I put my foot in my mouth, now I am going to 'go
>>silent' and
>>hope everyone forgets?"
>>
>>I don't forget that much...

Re: ahh, but we're talking about blitz, not standard Bruce Moreland 14:55:59 01/14/03
Re: ahh, but we're talking about blitz, not standard Vincent Diepeveen 14:35:12 01/14/03
- Re: ahh, but we're talking about blitz, not standard Bob Durrett 08:12:11 01/15/03
- Re: ahh, but we're talking about blitz, not standard Robert Hyatt 15:14:35 01/14/03
  - Re: ahh, but we're talking about blitz, not standard Omid David Tabibi 02:09:43 01/15/03
    - Re: ahh, but we're talking about blitz, not standard Bob Durrett 08:17:16 01/15/03
      - Re: ahh, but we're talking about blitz, not standard Robert Hyatt 08:34:22 01/15/03
      - Re: ahh, but we're talking about blitz, not standard Rolf Tueschen 08:29:07 01/15/03
- Re: ahh, but we're talking about blitz, not standard Rolf Tueschen 14:59:18 01/14/03
  - Re: ahh, but we're talking about blitz, not standard Robert Hyatt 15:15:49 01/14/03
    - Re: ahh, but we're talking about blitz, not standard Rolf Tueschen 15:24:04 01/14/03
Re: ahh, but we're talking about blitz, not standard Rolf Tueschen 14:04:30 01/14/03
Re: ahh, but we're talking about blitz, not standard Dann Corbit 14:01:51 01/14/03
- Re: ahh, but we're talking about blitz, not standard Miguel A. Ballicora 15:22:45 01/14/03
- Re: ahh, but we're talking about blitz, not standard Robert Hyatt 15:17:22 01/14/03

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.