Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: My standard rating is already higher than current crafty

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 13:59:54 01/14/03

Go up one level in this thread


On January 14, 2003 at 16:34:21, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:

>On January 14, 2003 at 14:57:38, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>tatistics for Diepeveen(FM)         On for:    0     Idle:    0
>
>          rating [need] win  loss  draw total   best
>Wild        1701  [6]   176   219    26   421   1961 (28-Apr-1998)
>Loser's     1526  [6]     0     9     0     9
>Bughouse    1582  [6]     4    13     0    17
>Crazyhouse  1593  [6]     8     4     0    12
>Bullet      2139  [8]   766   710    79  1555   2429 (14-Jul-1998)
>Blitz       2419       1128  1265   226  2619   2626 (09-Jan-2001)
>Standard    2455         39    31    11    81   2471 (10-Jun-2002)
>5-minute    2233  [4]   237   167    41   445   2305 (18-Nov-2002)
>1-minute    1883        305   266    28   599   2145 (01-Oct-2002)
>
>See my standard rating at icc 2455. It's same level like current crafty. Not to
>mention 1997.

So?  Did you notice my standard rating is 200 points lower than it was two weeks
ago?  Any idea why?  I know.  I'll explain it to you _after_ CCT5 is done.

But that is not what you said.  You said "I can kill any 1997 program on 1997
hardware."

Now you start your handwaving with "hey, my ICC standard rating is higher than
Crafty's standard rating."  Never mind that you said _blitz_ games of course.
Change
the subject.  Distort the topic.  etc...

I claim that is 100% baloney.

I have a 1997 version of Crafty and a 1997 piece of hardware ready to take up
the
match should you ever decide to say "yes".  You can the prove your "point"
easily
and with lots of witnesses.

Just name the time and place.


>
>I play standard games at like 5 AM in the night also... ...otherwise it would be
>2600+ :)
>
>After paderborn 2003 i have time perhaps again to care for your statement.
>
>You *only* ran on a single cpu pro200 in 1997.

The pentium pro 200 was a 1995 chip.  Bruce got his sometime that Summer I
believe.  I got mine a month or two later, before the end of the year.  The next
year I started looking at quads and ordered mine near the end of 1996, and it
arrived right after the first of the year.  So I have no idea what you are
talking
about.  Crafty played its first game over the Christmas holidays in 1994, and
in early 1995 was running on a Sparc 20 followed by a pentium 133mhz box.
Followed by the P6/200 in late 1995 and a year and a half later a quad pentium
pro.
1998 was the year of the quad xeon 400, which I received in december of that
year.  I think your memory is as bad as you claim mine is...

I ran on a quad pentium pro in 1997, and on a 500mhz alpha at the 1997 WMCCC
event so your statement is _wrong_.  I can easily scan the invoice for the ALR
box
I used.  It was delivered in January of 1997.  Again, you can make statements,
but
they have no basis in fact.

Your branch target buffer stuff is a good example.  Your partial-register stall
stuff
is another.  You can say something all you want, but it doesn't make it fact.



>
>The *worldchamps* 1997 you had an alpha, my memory serves me bad here, wasn't
>that the 500Mhz alpha 21164 from Bruce, or did Shredder ran onto that one?
>

Your memory serves you wrong.  I ran on a 500mhz 21164 loaded to Jason and
myself
directly from DEC.  We were going to use one of the three Kryo 733's but one
came in
broken and we were #3 on the list.

I have a 21164 500mhz box here, although it is currently boxed up and ready to
be
shipped to the warehouse.  I have my 1997 quad p6/200 still running and it is
ready
to play whenever you are ready.

From my perspective the match is pointless.  You have no chance.  In 1997 there
was no GM on ICC with a winning record against Crafty at Blitz.  Nor any IM.
So I am certain as to the outcome, but am willing to waste the time to _prove_
it when you are ready...

I have four games you have ever won against Crafty playing as "diepeveen."  This
includes over 40 losses by you as well.  So you haven't been doing nearly as
well
"in person" as you have been "in writing"....



>>I'm still waiting.  Vincent, you claimed "you could easily beat a 1997 program
>>on 1997
>>hardware."  I have a 1997 program and 1997 hardware waiting for you to prove
>>that
>>statement on.
>>
>>I have mentioned this more than once after you made the outrageous claim.  You
>>have
>>_never_ responded.
>>
>>Is this another case of "I put my foot in my mouth, now I am going to 'go
>>silent' and
>>hope everyone forgets?"
>>
>>I don't forget that much...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.