Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 14:39:34 01/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 14, 2003 at 16:59:54, Robert Hyatt wrote: When did you play those 'GM's for money? >On January 14, 2003 at 16:34:21, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On January 14, 2003 at 14:57:38, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>tatistics for Diepeveen(FM) On for: 0 Idle: 0 >> >> rating [need] win loss draw total best >>Wild 1701 [6] 176 219 26 421 1961 (28-Apr-1998) >>Loser's 1526 [6] 0 9 0 9 >>Bughouse 1582 [6] 4 13 0 17 >>Crazyhouse 1593 [6] 8 4 0 12 >>Bullet 2139 [8] 766 710 79 1555 2429 (14-Jul-1998) >>Blitz 2419 1128 1265 226 2619 2626 (09-Jan-2001) >>Standard 2455 39 31 11 81 2471 (10-Jun-2002) >>5-minute 2233 [4] 237 167 41 445 2305 (18-Nov-2002) >>1-minute 1883 305 266 28 599 2145 (01-Oct-2002) >> >>See my standard rating at icc 2455. It's same level like current crafty. Not to >>mention 1997. > >So? Did you notice my standard rating is 200 points lower than it was two weeks >ago? Any idea why? I know. I'll explain it to you _after_ CCT5 is done. > >But that is not what you said. You said "I can kill any 1997 program on 1997 >hardware." > >Now you start your handwaving with "hey, my ICC standard rating is higher than >Crafty's standard rating." Never mind that you said _blitz_ games of course. >Change >the subject. Distort the topic. etc... > >I claim that is 100% baloney. > >I have a 1997 version of Crafty and a 1997 piece of hardware ready to take up >the >match should you ever decide to say "yes". You can the prove your "point" >easily >and with lots of witnesses. > >Just name the time and place. > > >> >>I play standard games at like 5 AM in the night also... ...otherwise it would be >>2600+ :) >> >>After paderborn 2003 i have time perhaps again to care for your statement. >> >>You *only* ran on a single cpu pro200 in 1997. > >The pentium pro 200 was a 1995 chip. Bruce got his sometime that Summer I >believe. I got mine a month or two later, before the end of the year. The next >year I started looking at quads and ordered mine near the end of 1996, and it >arrived right after the first of the year. So I have no idea what you are >talking >about. Crafty played its first game over the Christmas holidays in 1994, and >in early 1995 was running on a Sparc 20 followed by a pentium 133mhz box. >Followed by the P6/200 in late 1995 and a year and a half later a quad pentium >pro. >1998 was the year of the quad xeon 400, which I received in december of that >year. I think your memory is as bad as you claim mine is... > >I ran on a quad pentium pro in 1997, and on a 500mhz alpha at the 1997 WMCCC >event so your statement is _wrong_. I can easily scan the invoice for the ALR >box >I used. It was delivered in January of 1997. Again, you can make statements, >but >they have no basis in fact. > >Your branch target buffer stuff is a good example. Your partial-register stall >stuff >is another. You can say something all you want, but it doesn't make it fact. > > > >> >>The *worldchamps* 1997 you had an alpha, my memory serves me bad here, wasn't >>that the 500Mhz alpha 21164 from Bruce, or did Shredder ran onto that one? >> > >Your memory serves you wrong. I ran on a 500mhz 21164 loaded to Jason and >myself >directly from DEC. We were going to use one of the three Kryo 733's but one >came in >broken and we were #3 on the list. > >I have a 21164 500mhz box here, although it is currently boxed up and ready to >be >shipped to the warehouse. I have my 1997 quad p6/200 still running and it is >ready >to play whenever you are ready. > >From my perspective the match is pointless. You have no chance. In 1997 there >was no GM on ICC with a winning record against Crafty at Blitz. Nor any IM. >So I am certain as to the outcome, but am willing to waste the time to _prove_ >it when you are ready... > >I have four games you have ever won against Crafty playing as "diepeveen." This >includes over 40 losses by you as well. So you haven't been doing nearly as >well >"in person" as you have been "in writing".... > > > >>>I'm still waiting. Vincent, you claimed "you could easily beat a 1997 program >>>on 1997 >>>hardware." I have a 1997 program and 1997 hardware waiting for you to prove >>>that >>>statement on. >>> >>>I have mentioned this more than once after you made the outrageous claim. You >>>have >>>_never_ responded. >>> >>>Is this another case of "I put my foot in my mouth, now I am going to 'go >>>silent' and >>>hope everyone forgets?" >>> >>>I don't forget that much...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.