Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: ahh, but we're talking about blitz, not standard

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 15:14:35 01/14/03

Go up one level in this thread


On January 14, 2003 at 17:35:12, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:

>On January 14, 2003 at 16:46:43, Peter Kappler wrote:
>
>i get paid money for 40 in 2 so do the GMs, not for blitz at a computerscreen.
>
>Hyatt said that he beated GMs all over in 1997. Not the level.

I said _blitz_.  If that isn't "the level" then I don't know what it is.
I hope everyone here knows what "blitz" means.  But even at beyond
blitz, I did well.  We played some 30-minute game type events and all
the comps did well against GM players.

>
>So i can easily show up myself and play a fair blitz level, whereas 40 in 2
>(tournament) is clear of course.

Should I post a couple of longer games against Crafty you played a long while
back?

Of course, we _are_ talking about blitz.  That was your gaffe, not mine.  You
said blitz.  I am sticking with blitz.  I suspect you are running and hiding.


>
>Note that i'm blitz champion of netherlands youth till 20 some years ago,
>that was a level of 25 0 if i remember well.

I have no idea what you are talking about.  25 0 is not "blitz".  Blitz is 5 0,
but I play 5 3 as well...

I have a black belt in Karate.  Won't help me beat Crafty however.  Neither will
any "title" you claim to hold.  Only playing the game will do any good...



>
>>On January 14, 2003 at 16:34:21, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>>
>>>On January 14, 2003 at 14:57:38, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>
>>>tatistics for Diepeveen(FM)         On for:    0     Idle:    0
>>>
>>>          rating [need] win  loss  draw total   best
>>>Wild        1701  [6]   176   219    26   421   1961 (28-Apr-1998)
>>>Loser's     1526  [6]     0     9     0     9
>>>Bughouse    1582  [6]     4    13     0    17
>>>Crazyhouse  1593  [6]     8     4     0    12
>>>Bullet      2139  [8]   766   710    79  1555   2429 (14-Jul-1998)
>>>Blitz       2419       1128  1265   226  2619   2626 (09-Jan-2001)
>>>Standard    2455         39    31    11    81   2471 (10-Jun-2002)
>>>5-minute    2233  [4]   237   167    41   445   2305 (18-Nov-2002)
>>>1-minute    1883        305   266    28   599   2145 (01-Oct-2002)
>>>
>>>See my standard rating at icc 2455. It's same level like current crafty. Not to
>>>mention 1997.
>>
>>
>>Nice try, Vincent.
>>
>>Quoting from  http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?276733
>>
>>  "In 1997 i won easily in blitz from all programs. They knew nothing.
>>   Bad evaluation. Very passive play. Small search depths."
>>
>>
>>So, I wish you good luck in your blitz match with Crafty.  I can't wait to
>>watch.  Maybe you can play the games between rounds at CCT5 this weekend. :)
>>
>>-Peter
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>I play standard games at like 5 AM in the night also... ...otherwise it would be
>>>2600+ :)
>>>
>>>After paderborn 2003 i have time perhaps again to care for your statement.
>>>
>>>You *only* ran on a single cpu pro200 in 1997.
>>>
>>>The *worldchamps* 1997 you had an alpha, my memory serves me bad here, wasn't
>>>that the 500Mhz alpha 21164 from Bruce, or did Shredder ran onto that one?
>>>
>>>>I'm still waiting.  Vincent, you claimed "you could easily beat a 1997 program
>>>>on 1997
>>>>hardware."  I have a 1997 program and 1997 hardware waiting for you to prove
>>>>that
>>>>statement on.
>>>>
>>>>I have mentioned this more than once after you made the outrageous claim.  You
>>>>have
>>>>_never_ responded.
>>>>
>>>>Is this another case of "I put my foot in my mouth, now I am going to 'go
>>>>silent' and
>>>>hope everyone forgets?"
>>>>
>>>>I don't forget that much...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.