Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 15:15:49 01/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 14, 2003 at 17:59:18, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On January 14, 2003 at 17:35:12, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On January 14, 2003 at 16:46:43, Peter Kappler wrote: >> >>i get paid money for 40 in 2 so do the GMs, not for blitz at a computerscreen. > >What a nightmare! I can't believe it. He quotes you that you beat _all_ progs at >BLITZ! And now you tell us when exactly you get paid for... and you do as if it >was clear that you did NOT mean BLITZ. I mean is this a hidden corner here where >14 year old kids try their first cigarettes and claim a lot of other things? > >That is a real scandal. > Don't take too much out of this. This happens _all_ the time in discussions with Vincent. Dance and wave. Wave and dance. > > >> >>Hyatt said that he beated GMs all over in 1997. Not the level. > >This is a lie. Fair and straight. Because! Because we were exclusively talking >about BLITZ since you made the original claim! Vincent, Vincent! > > >> >>So i can easily show up myself and play a fair blitz level, whereas 40 in 2 >>(tournament) is clear of course. > >You can do what you want but this is NOT what you claimed. And BLITZ in whole >Europe means 5 0 and that was it what Bob directly concluded after your claim >and you never objected. BLITZ is 5 0 or 5 3, and Bob said he would also accept 5 >3 for you especially. Now act like a real champion and prove your claim! > > > >> >>Note that i'm blitz champion of netherlands youth till 20 some years ago, >>that was a level of 25 0 if i remember well. > >You know that you are NOT talking about the European terms. 25' that is RAPID, >not BLITZ! Why do you act this way? > >Kind regards, > >Rolf Tueschen > > >> >>>On January 14, 2003 at 16:34:21, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>> >>>>On January 14, 2003 at 14:57:38, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>> >>>>tatistics for Diepeveen(FM) On for: 0 Idle: 0 >>>> >>>> rating [need] win loss draw total best >>>>Wild 1701 [6] 176 219 26 421 1961 (28-Apr-1998) >>>>Loser's 1526 [6] 0 9 0 9 >>>>Bughouse 1582 [6] 4 13 0 17 >>>>Crazyhouse 1593 [6] 8 4 0 12 >>>>Bullet 2139 [8] 766 710 79 1555 2429 (14-Jul-1998) >>>>Blitz 2419 1128 1265 226 2619 2626 (09-Jan-2001) >>>>Standard 2455 39 31 11 81 2471 (10-Jun-2002) >>>>5-minute 2233 [4] 237 167 41 445 2305 (18-Nov-2002) >>>>1-minute 1883 305 266 28 599 2145 (01-Oct-2002) >>>> >>>>See my standard rating at icc 2455. It's same level like current crafty. Not to >>>>mention 1997. >>> >>> >>>Nice try, Vincent. >>> >>>Quoting from http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?276733 >>> >>> "In 1997 i won easily in blitz from all programs. They knew nothing. >>> Bad evaluation. Very passive play. Small search depths." >>> >>> >>>So, I wish you good luck in your blitz match with Crafty. I can't wait to >>>watch. Maybe you can play the games between rounds at CCT5 this weekend. :) >>> >>>-Peter >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>>I play standard games at like 5 AM in the night also... ...otherwise it would be >>>>2600+ :) >>>> >>>>After paderborn 2003 i have time perhaps again to care for your statement. >>>> >>>>You *only* ran on a single cpu pro200 in 1997. >>>> >>>>The *worldchamps* 1997 you had an alpha, my memory serves me bad here, wasn't >>>>that the 500Mhz alpha 21164 from Bruce, or did Shredder ran onto that one? >>>> >>>>>I'm still waiting. Vincent, you claimed "you could easily beat a 1997 program >>>>>on 1997 >>>>>hardware." I have a 1997 program and 1997 hardware waiting for you to prove >>>>>that >>>>>statement on. >>>>> >>>>>I have mentioned this more than once after you made the outrageous claim. You >>>>>have >>>>>_never_ responded. >>>>> >>>>>Is this another case of "I put my foot in my mouth, now I am going to 'go >>>>>silent' and >>>>>hope everyone forgets?" >>>>> >>>>>I don't forget that much...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.