Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 15:24:04 01/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 14, 2003 at 18:15:49, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On January 14, 2003 at 17:59:18, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>On January 14, 2003 at 17:35:12, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On January 14, 2003 at 16:46:43, Peter Kappler wrote: >>> >>>i get paid money for 40 in 2 so do the GMs, not for blitz at a computerscreen. >> >>What a nightmare! I can't believe it. He quotes you that you beat _all_ progs at >>BLITZ! And now you tell us when exactly you get paid for... and you do as if it >>was clear that you did NOT mean BLITZ. I mean is this a hidden corner here where >>14 year old kids try their first cigarettes and claim a lot of other things? >> >>That is a real scandal. >> > >Don't take too much out of this. This happens _all_ the time in discussions >with Vincent. Dance and wave. Wave and dance. You mean New Wave? Of course I know that you knew that in the Netherlands you can go into a "coffee-shop" and there you can smoke hash = grass - legally. You know, flower power, hippies and such some. So, it might well be possible that if you're on dope you visualize 5 0 in the looong, extended version. So, Vincent could well be correct when he was talking about "Blitz". Bad luck for you, Bob. I fear, Vincent will beat you N to ZERO... :) Rolf Tueschen > > >> >> >>> >>>Hyatt said that he beated GMs all over in 1997. Not the level. >> >>This is a lie. Fair and straight. Because! Because we were exclusively talking >>about BLITZ since you made the original claim! Vincent, Vincent! >> >> >>> >>>So i can easily show up myself and play a fair blitz level, whereas 40 in 2 >>>(tournament) is clear of course. >> >>You can do what you want but this is NOT what you claimed. And BLITZ in whole >>Europe means 5 0 and that was it what Bob directly concluded after your claim >>and you never objected. BLITZ is 5 0 or 5 3, and Bob said he would also accept 5 >>3 for you especially. Now act like a real champion and prove your claim! >> >> >> >>> >>>Note that i'm blitz champion of netherlands youth till 20 some years ago, >>>that was a level of 25 0 if i remember well. >> >>You know that you are NOT talking about the European terms. 25' that is RAPID, >>not BLITZ! Why do you act this way? >> >>Kind regards, >> >>Rolf Tueschen >> >> >>> >>>>On January 14, 2003 at 16:34:21, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 14, 2003 at 14:57:38, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>> >>>>>tatistics for Diepeveen(FM) On for: 0 Idle: 0 >>>>> >>>>> rating [need] win loss draw total best >>>>>Wild 1701 [6] 176 219 26 421 1961 (28-Apr-1998) >>>>>Loser's 1526 [6] 0 9 0 9 >>>>>Bughouse 1582 [6] 4 13 0 17 >>>>>Crazyhouse 1593 [6] 8 4 0 12 >>>>>Bullet 2139 [8] 766 710 79 1555 2429 (14-Jul-1998) >>>>>Blitz 2419 1128 1265 226 2619 2626 (09-Jan-2001) >>>>>Standard 2455 39 31 11 81 2471 (10-Jun-2002) >>>>>5-minute 2233 [4] 237 167 41 445 2305 (18-Nov-2002) >>>>>1-minute 1883 305 266 28 599 2145 (01-Oct-2002) >>>>> >>>>>See my standard rating at icc 2455. It's same level like current crafty. Not to >>>>>mention 1997. >>>> >>>> >>>>Nice try, Vincent. >>>> >>>>Quoting from http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?276733 >>>> >>>> "In 1997 i won easily in blitz from all programs. They knew nothing. >>>> Bad evaluation. Very passive play. Small search depths." >>>> >>>> >>>>So, I wish you good luck in your blitz match with Crafty. I can't wait to >>>>watch. Maybe you can play the games between rounds at CCT5 this weekend. :) >>>> >>>>-Peter >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>I play standard games at like 5 AM in the night also... ...otherwise it would be >>>>>2600+ :) >>>>> >>>>>After paderborn 2003 i have time perhaps again to care for your statement. >>>>> >>>>>You *only* ran on a single cpu pro200 in 1997. >>>>> >>>>>The *worldchamps* 1997 you had an alpha, my memory serves me bad here, wasn't >>>>>that the 500Mhz alpha 21164 from Bruce, or did Shredder ran onto that one? >>>>> >>>>>>I'm still waiting. Vincent, you claimed "you could easily beat a 1997 program >>>>>>on 1997 >>>>>>hardware." I have a 1997 program and 1997 hardware waiting for you to prove >>>>>>that >>>>>>statement on. >>>>>> >>>>>>I have mentioned this more than once after you made the outrageous claim. You >>>>>>have >>>>>>_never_ responded. >>>>>> >>>>>>Is this another case of "I put my foot in my mouth, now I am going to 'go >>>>>>silent' and >>>>>>hope everyone forgets?" >>>>>> >>>>>>I don't forget that much...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.