Author: Peter Fendrich
Date: 03:44:08 01/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 15, 2003 at 05:17:34, scott farrell wrote: >On January 14, 2003 at 23:40:04, Jeremiah Penery wrote: > >>On January 14, 2003 at 22:05:34, scott farrell wrote: >> >>>Do we know that if you play Rb4, that white has to take the sac? >>> >>>If white doesnt have to take the Rook sac, then maybe there is no solution to >>>wac.230. >> >>What would you suggest instead of taking the rook? > >Dont take it ... I cant see anything forcing the capture, I am no GM, or even a >good player by most standards (it took me sometime to see how the rook sac works >even after Iwas given the move). > >What if you simply dont take the sac? The idea is Rb4-Ra4-Ra2 and both the a- and b-pawn can advance without any possible resistance from white. /Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.