Author: David Rasmussen
Date: 15:58:43 01/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 15, 2003 at 17:36:43, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >On January 15, 2003 at 16:54:38, David Rasmussen wrote: > >>Why did you choose to go with ordinary alpha-beta search? >> >>/David > > >It's not an "ordinary alpha-beta search." See: > >http://members.home.nl/matador/chess840.htm#SEARCH > >where you will find: > >"REBEL uses the standard *Aspiration* Alpha-Beta Search technique..." I know he uses aspiration search, but I deliberately decided not to write that because null-window search schemes such as negascout/PVS can be and are used for aspiration search too. They are too separate decisions. So given that he uses aspiration search, why did he choose normal alpha-beta over negascout/PVS? /David
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.