Author: Dieter Buerssner
Date: 15:40:46 01/16/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 16, 2003 at 18:28:31, David Rasmussen wrote: >On January 16, 2003 at 18:24:05, Dieter Buerssner wrote: > >>On January 16, 2003 at 18:15:01, David Rasmussen wrote: >> >>>Didn't I show one of 7:1 rather? >> >>Perhaps, I was not looking carefully enough. What I saw (now citing from your >>post): >> >>---- >>In a position such as this, this is Chezzz _without_ EGTBs: >>[...] >> nps: 718426 nodes: 21559976 Q-nodes: 707976 (3%) >> ^^^^^^ >>[...] >>This is Chezzz _with_ EGTBs: >>[...] >> nps: 234538 nodes: 7038510 Q-nodes: 196510 (2%) >> ^^^^^^ >>---- >> >>This looks more like 3:1 than like 7:1 to me. But probably I missed something >>else ... >> > >You are right. But that's when doing it once, and then clearing the hash and >doing it again, so everthing is "warmed up" and ready. When just doing it with a >newly started engine, nps is 113000 or so, instead of 234000. Do you want to make jokes of me? I tried to give some tips. I tried to take account of the numbers, you gave. You start to contradict, with some 7:1 number, which I cannot see. Are we in some Monthy Python scetch here? I will learn my lesson. Probably I missed a post of you, where the 7:1 can be seen. Please point it out to me. Dieter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.