Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 09:45:45 01/17/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 17, 2003 at 10:42:33, Joshua Lee wrote: >bm axb5 - NOLOT #6 >rnbqk2r/1p3ppp/p7/1NpPp3/QPP1P1n1/P4N2/4KbPP/R1B2B1R b kq - 0 1 > >Analysis by Fritz 7: > >1...Nd7 2.Nd6+ Kf8 3.Ng5 Nb6 4.Ndxf7 Kg8 > = (-0.16) Depth: 6/35 00:00:00 366kN >1...Nd7-- > = (0.12) Depth: 7/28 00:00:00 391kN >1...Nd7 2.Nd6+ Kf8 3.Nxc8 b5 4.cxb5 Rxc8 5.Qxa6 cxb4 > ² (0.69) Depth: 7/28 00:00:00 427kN >1...axb5! > ² (0.66) Depth: 7/37 00:00:02 989kN >1...axb5! > ² (0.50) Depth: 7/37 00:00:02 992kN >1...axb5! > = (0.19) Depth: 7/37 00:00:02 999kN >1...axb5 2.Qxa8 Na6 3.h3 Nc7 4.Qa5 > = (0.09) Depth: 7/37 00:00:02 1004kN >1...axb5-- > ² (0.37) Depth: 8/31 00:00:02 1124kN >1...axb5 > ² (0.37) Depth: 8/31 00:00:02 1133kN >1...axb5 2.Qxa8 Na6 3.cxb5 Nc7 4.Qb8 cxb4 5.axb4 f6 6.h3 > ² (0.50) Depth: 9/30 00:00:06 2430kN >1...axb5-- > ± (0.78) Depth: 10/35 00:00:12 5037kN >1...axb5 > ± (0.78) Depth: 10/35 00:00:12 5093kN >1...Nd7! > ± (0.75) Depth: 10/35 00:00:13 5464kN >1...Nd7 2.Nd6+ Kf8 3.Nxc8 b5 4.cxb5 Rxc8 5.h3 axb5 6.Qd1 > ² (0.69) Depth: 10/35 00:00:13 5799kN >1...Nd7 2.Nd6+ Kf8 3.h3 Nb6 4.Qe8+ Qxe8 5.Nxe8 Kxe8 6.hxg4 Bd4 7.Nxd4 exd4 >8.bxc5 Nxc4 > ² (0.50) Depth: 11/40 00:00:35 16021kN >1...Nd7 2.Nd6+ Kf8 3.Nxc8 Ndf6 4.Qa5 Qxc8 5.h3 Bd4 6.Nxd4 cxd4 7.Kf3 Ne3 8.Bxe3 >dxe3 > ² (0.66) Depth: 12/39 00:01:01 28254kN >1...Nd7! > ² (0.37) Depth: 13/42 00:02:50 80884kN >1...Nd7 2.Nd6+ Kf8 3.Nxc8 Bd4 4.Nxd4 exd4 5.Nd6 d3+ 6.Kxd3 Nf2+ 7.Kc2 Nxh1 >8.Nxb7 Qe7 > ² (0.31) Depth: 13/42 00:03:13 92105kN >1...Nd7 2.Nd6+ Kf8 3.h3 Nb6 4.Nxb7 Bxb7 5.Qb3 Bd4 6.Nxd4 exd4 7.hxg4 Qf6 8.bxc5 > ² (0.47) Depth: 14/43 00:06:54 200200kN >1...Nd7 2.Nd6+ Kf8 3.h3 Nb6 4.Nxb7 Bxb7 5.Qb3 Bd4 6.Nxd4 exd4 7.hxg4 Qf6 8.bxc5 > ² (0.47) Depth: 15/47 00:19:29 569978kN >1...Nd7-- > ± (0.75) Depth: 16/48 00:38:08 1119117kN >1...Nd7 2.Nd6+ Kf8 3.h3 Nb6 4.Nxb7 Bxb7 5.Qb3 Nd7 6.hxg4 Bg3 7.Rh3 Bf4 8.Kf2 > ± (0.81) Depth: 16/51 01:09:25 2057428kN >1...axb5! > ± (0.78) Depth: 16/51 01:14:45 2209222kN >1...axb5! > ² (0.62) Depth: 16/51 01:18:18 2310468kN >1...axb5 2.Qxa8 Qc7 3.h3 Bd4 4.Ra2 Nf6 5.Nxd4 cxd4 6.Kf3 bxc4 7.Qa5 Qxa5 8.bxa5 > ² (0.41) Depth: 16/51 01:28:34 2601340kN >1...axb5 2.Qxa8 Qc7 3.h3 Bd4 4.Ra2 Nf6 5.Nxd4 cxd4 6.Kf3 bxc4 7.Qa5 Qxa5 > ² (0.34) Depth: 17/50 03:11:19 5594783kN >1...axb5 2.Qxa8 Qc7 3.Rb1 Bd4 4.bxc5 Qxc5 5.Qxb8 0-0 6.Rb4 Nf2 7.Nxd4 Nxh1 >8.Qxe5 > ² (0.37) Depth: 18/55 07:10:51 12610578kN > >(Lee, Kingpawn 07.01.2003) That doesn't look "solved". IE .37 is not winning anything. The score seems to be dropping iteration by iteration in fact... which causes the best move to change, but maybe not for the right reason.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.