Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 19:30:11 01/17/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 17, 2003 at 22:17:33, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On January 17, 2003 at 20:01:04, enrico carrisco wrote: > >>On January 17, 2003 at 19:22:56, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On January 17, 2003 at 18:47:59, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>On January 17, 2003 at 18:39:29, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>> >>>>>So the Fritzes are still the best! >>>>> >>>>>http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=724 >>> >>>None of your conclusions follow from the data presented. >> >>That's what I love about average user interpretations of the SSDF list. Armed >>and dangerous with "theories." >> >>-elc. What did I missed here? I didn't say better then all the commecials. Simply do the comparison. Sorry but this is NOT a theory, it is simply one of the best way to compare the strength of these programs, unless you have a better rating system than the SSDF. 10 Hiarcs 8.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2679 25 -25 772 55% 2642 11 Ruffian 1.0.1 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2676 39 -37 346 60% 2604 12 Rebel Century 4.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2673 29 -29 590 60% 2603 16 Gandalf 4.32h 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2650 34 -33 430 54% 2622 19 Gandalf 5.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2638 49 -50 202 46% 2670 20 Gandalf 5.1 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2636 25 -25 758 55% 2603 PS: And you can also add that on the same hardware an Athlon 1200 MHz, it is as strong as Hiarcs 8.0 and Rebel Century 4.0 Pichard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.