Author: maria clara benedicto
Date: 03:11:21 01/18/03
Go up one level in this thread
But how heavy were the two bears? because if A bear is 600 lbs. and B bear is 900 lbs, then B bear should be heavier, right? or have i left something out? should we get their average weight? or should we consider thei weight after/beffore they have eaten? what weight should we consider at what age? or do we disregard their ages? what kind of weigh scales should we agree on? your scale? his scale? my scale? do we have to test the different weights recorded by the different scales we will use? what would GM Alfred E. Neumann say about all this? On January 18, 2003 at 00:09:04, Dann Corbit wrote: >On January 17, 2003 at 22:30:11, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On January 17, 2003 at 22:17:33, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On January 17, 2003 at 20:01:04, enrico carrisco wrote: >>> >>>>On January 17, 2003 at 19:22:56, Dann Corbit wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 17, 2003 at 18:47:59, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On January 17, 2003 at 18:39:29, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>So the Fritzes are still the best! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=724 >>>>> >>>>>None of your conclusions follow from the data presented. >>>> >>>>That's what I love about average user interpretations of the SSDF list. Armed >>>>and dangerous with "theories." >>>> >>>>-elc. >> >Illustration: > >I saw a bear that was between 7 feet 9 inches and 9 feet 2 inches in length. >I saw another bear that was between 7 feet 5 inches and 8 feet 11 inches in >length. >Will you conclude that the first bear was bigger than the second bear? > >because 2725 is bigger than 2675. So here we saw a bear that was between 8 and >9 feet long and compared it with a bear that was between 6 and 7 feet long. The >first bear was bigger.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.