Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Are the following sacrifices from Movei-Amateur correct?

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 03:59:17 01/19/03

Go up one level in this thread


On January 19, 2003 at 06:33:29, Andrew Williams wrote:

>On January 19, 2003 at 05:21:43, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>Movei lost 2 pawns against amateur I checked with yace only material to find
>>when it blundered and yace conclusions are that Movei blundered in Moves 17 and
>>27.
>>
>>I checked later with Deep Fritz6 and Deep Fritz6 conclusions are that the moves
>>were the best moves and Movei blundered later
>>
>>Here are the relevant positions
>>
>>r4rk1/ppp3pp/2nbpn2/1N6/3P3q/5B1P/PP3PP1/R1BQR1K1 b - - 0 17
>>
>>Movei played 17...Rae8
>>
>>Deep Fritz6 agree with that move but Yace says that Nd8 is better and not losing
>>material.
>>
>
>After a 3-minute think, PM comes up with this:
>
>11=  -0.72   00:02:43.59  23297071   1...Rae8 2.Be3 a6 3.Nxd6 cxd6 4.d5 Ne5
>                                     5.dxe6 Nxf3 6.Qxf3 Ne4
>
>
>
>>2r1r1k1/6pp/2p1p3/B2p4/3Pnq2/3Q3P/PPR1RPP1/6K1 b - - 0 27
>>
>>Movei played 27...c5
>>
>
>After 3-minutes, PM thinks this:
>
>12>  -1.21   00:02:10.90  19757698   1...c5 2.dxc5 Rxc5 3.Rxc5 Nxc5 4.Qc3 Ne4
>                                     5.Qc6 Qf7 6.f3 Ng3
>
>By the time the search finished, PM had concluded that the score was at least
>-1.15 at depth 12.
>
>Regards
>
>Andrew

You should give PM more time(maybe after CCT5)
2...Rxc5 in the pv is bad and it seems that pm does not see it.

The interesting question is if PM is going to avoid c5 after more time.

Deep Fritz6 likes c5 even after seeing that it is losing material and not having
2...Rxc5 in the main line.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.