Author: Rajen Gupta
Date: 07:37:41 01/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
why is it a waste of time? once one changes the parameters it is the same as having a brand new engine. the fact that it is a chessmaster personality should make no difference. and i think the scores against the default personality should also be considered when estimating the overall strength. for example i think kurt ought to play at least 30 game between the default setting chessmaster and UTZ_n and UTZ_P and these should be added to to the final tally under each of these settings. and so should sedat. On January 19, 2003 at 08:07:59, SedatCambaz wrote: >On January 19, 2003 at 07:49:40, Kurt Utzinger wrote: > >>Matches between special settings vs the default Chessmaster 9000 are more or >>less a waste of time. I have mentioned this for many times from own experience. >>It might happen that the "best cm9 setting" vs other "cm9 settings" gets much >>worse results against other programs. For this reason I think the only way to >>find out if a special cm9 setting is stronger than default is to play vs other >>programs and to compare the score. >>Kurt >> >>Homepage "Kurt & Rolf Chess": http://www.beepworld.de/members39/utzinger > >Hi Kurt > >Yes, >I agree with you > > >Regards, >Sedat
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.