Author: Omid David Tabibi
Date: 10:56:22 01/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 19, 2003 at 13:48:55, Andrew Williams wrote: >On January 19, 2003 at 10:59:46, Joel wrote: > >>Thanks for your reply Andrew. >> >>Hashing seems to work better for me too, though I have some fears about filling >>up the hash table with a whole lot of rubbish. My thoughts are pretty much >>directed at trying to think of a replacement scheme I am happy with. >> >>Joel > >I should have mentioned that I only store in the first two or three plies of the >qsearch. And the entries get negative drafts, so they don't hang around too >long. > I always store q-nodes (put them as depth 0). By storing only 2--3 plies of q-search, how much do you save? >Andrew
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.