Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 11:29:16 01/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 19, 2003 at 13:19:39, James T. Walker wrote:
>On January 18, 2003 at 13:45:22, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>On January 18, 2003 at 00:51:15, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>
>>>On January 18, 2003 at 00:35:43, Christophe Theron wrote:
>>>
>>>>On January 17, 2003 at 18:39:29, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>So the Fritzes are still the best!
>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=724
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>You ignore error bars, and worse you ignore the K6-2 450 list.
>>>>
>>>> Christophe
>>>
>>>
>>>If you average the results on the two computers K6-2 450 and Athlon 1200 MHz
>>>Chess Tiger 15 is still the closest competitor to Deep Fritz 7. According to Dan
>>>your bear (Tiger) is getting as tall as the first bear :)
>>>
>>>Pichard.
>>
>>
>>
>>Thanks for noticing it! :)
>>
>>
>>
>> Christophe
>
>The thing is that Chess Tiger 15 seems to not gain as much with cpu speed as
>Fritz. In fact on my XP2400+ Chess Tiger 15 is lagging slightly behind Chess
>Tiger 14. It is definitely behind Fritz 8 and Shredder 7 in my database. I
>don't have a lot of games but enough to cause concern.
>Jim
I knew somebody would say something like that.
I'm sorry, but if it is already difficult to establish which is the best program
overall, it is even more difficult to establish which one gains more from faster
hardware. It's simple math.
So don't even think to be able to assert something like that before reaching the
10000 games mark. Please.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.