Author: James T. Walker
Date: 16:57:11 01/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 19, 2003 at 14:29:16, Christophe Theron wrote: >On January 19, 2003 at 13:19:39, James T. Walker wrote: > >>On January 18, 2003 at 13:45:22, Christophe Theron wrote: >> >>>On January 18, 2003 at 00:51:15, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>On January 18, 2003 at 00:35:43, Christophe Theron wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 17, 2003 at 18:39:29, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>So the Fritzes are still the best! >>>>>> >>>>>>http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=724 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>You ignore error bars, and worse you ignore the K6-2 450 list. >>>>> >>>>> Christophe >>>> >>>> >>>>If you average the results on the two computers K6-2 450 and Athlon 1200 MHz >>>>Chess Tiger 15 is still the closest competitor to Deep Fritz 7. According to Dan >>>>your bear (Tiger) is getting as tall as the first bear :) >>>> >>>>Pichard. >>> >>> >>> >>>Thanks for noticing it! :) >>> >>> >>> >>> Christophe >> >>The thing is that Chess Tiger 15 seems to not gain as much with cpu speed as >>Fritz. In fact on my XP2400+ Chess Tiger 15 is lagging slightly behind Chess >>Tiger 14. It is definitely behind Fritz 8 and Shredder 7 in my database. I >>don't have a lot of games but enough to cause concern. >>Jim > > > > >I knew somebody would say something like that. > >I'm sorry, but if it is already difficult to establish which is the best program >overall, it is even more difficult to establish which one gains more from faster >hardware. It's simple math. > >So don't even think to be able to assert something like that before reaching the >10000 games mark. Please. > > > > Christophe Get real. You will never see Chess Tiger 15 10000th game.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.