Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: CCT5 "award" nominees?

Author: Arturo Ochoa

Date: 07:05:41 01/20/03


>Worst theoretical novelty:
>
>6...Rb8 in Ruffian-Diep.  Either a bug in Vincent's book building code, or
>garbage in the PGN he used to generate it.
>
[D]rnbqk1r1/pp2ppbp/2p2np1/3p4/2PP4/2N1PN2/PP2BPPP/R1BQK2R w KQq -
>
>
>-Peter

Hello:

To call it the worst theoritical novelty is a mess.... because it was not a
novelty, it was a severe bug...

It was just a bug in the Building Code that caused such horrible move.

Of course, in the tournament move was considered 6. ... O-O, but Dont ask me why
Diep move this move.....

Regards, Arturo Ochoa.

Re: CCT5 "award" nominees? Uri Blass 07:29:09 01/20/03
- Re: CCT5 "award" nominees? Arturo Ochoa 09:31:26 01/20/03
  - Re: CCT5 "award" nominees? Uri Blass 11:24:58 01/20/03
    - Re: CCT5 "award" nominees? Peter Kappler 20:43:06 01/20/03
  - Re: CCT5 "award" nominees? Rolf Tueschen 09:39:37 01/20/03
    - Re: CCT5 "award" nominees? Arturo Ochoa 09:47:33 01/20/03
      - Re: CCT5 "award" nominees? Rolf Tueschen 09:54:01 01/20/03
- Re: CCT5 "award" nominees? José Carlos 07:33:24 01/20/03
  - Re: CCT5 "award" nominees? Dave Gomboc 18:40:14 01/20/03
    - Re: CCT5 "award" nominees? José Carlos 01:34:43 01/21/03
      - Re: CCT5 "award" nominees? Dave Gomboc 22:20:15 01/21/03
      - Re: CCT5 "award" nominees? Steffen Jakob 02:19:31 01/21/03
        
        Re: CCT5 "award" nominees? José Carlos 02:40:41 01/21/03

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.