Author: Uri Blass
Date: 07:29:09 01/20/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 20, 2003 at 10:05:41, Arturo Ochoa wrote: > >>Worst theoretical novelty: >> >>6...Rb8 in Ruffian-Diep. Either a bug in Vincent's book building code, or >>garbage in the PGN he used to generate it. >> >[D]rnbqk1r1/pp2ppbp/2p2np1/3p4/2PP4/2N1PN2/PP2BPPP/R1BQK2R w KQq - >> >> >>-Peter > >Hello: > >To call it the worst theoritical novelty is a mess.... because it was not a >novelty, it was a severe bug... If we define something that was never played in the past as a novelty then it is clearly a novelty by definition. The fact that the move is because of a bug does not change it. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.