Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 09:39:37 01/20/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 20, 2003 at 12:31:26, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >You define that, we dont define that. You give a definition that you "believe" >(using your usual word) is correct. Such blunder because of a bug in the code is >not novelty. Don't want to spoil the party but a novelty is defined as he said. It's a new move however stupid or buggy it might be. :) Was that new for you? Rolf Tueschen > >But who can discuss with you? ..........
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.