Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: CCT5, was there something missing?

Author: Peter Skinner

Date: 12:49:02 01/20/03

Go up one level in this thread


On January 20, 2003 at 15:45:59, Uri Blass wrote:

>On January 20, 2003 at 15:38:00, Peter Skinner wrote:
>
>>With the lack of commercial products participating in the CCT, does it lose some
>>of the luster in winning it?
>>
>>Of course there are always going to be "what ifs" when all participants do not
>>play. Ferret was allowed to play without kibitzing any information. What would
>>have happened if Fritz joined and did the same? Would the result have been the
>>same?
>>
>>It seems that there was allowances made for some, and not others. Why was this
>>the case?
>
>Bruce simply did not know about the rules and it was a mistake of Volker when he
>did not ask the people to write I agree that my program kibitz automatically the
>pv and the nodes and the time when it plays.
>
>The problem of not kibizing was only in the first day and I understood that the
>players that did not kibitz in the first day kibited in the second day.
>
>
>>
>>I am sure if the rule had not been in place, the likes of Shredder, Fritz, and
>>possibly Junior would have participated.
>
>I guess that it is not the reason for them not to play.
>Did one of the programmers said that he is not going to play because of that
>reason?

No this is only an assumption as Fritz and Junior have participated in the past.
I could understand Junior not participating due to it's match with Kasparov.

I do not know of any other reason that Fritz would not have participated.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.