Author: Gerd Isenberg
Date: 12:55:22 01/20/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 20, 2003 at 15:10:53, Matt Taylor wrote: <snip> >I've never found a way around this limitation. My best answer is to say that the >loads/stores can be optimized out by a post-optimizer. > >I have tools which would enable me to easily write such a program, but the tools >are only half-working. I need the ability to reverse engineer an executable file >-- right now I miss some sections of code completely, and finding them does not >look like an easy task. Once that is done, it would be trivial to inline >functions and do some simple load/store optimization. > >-Matt Thanks Matt, that's a real pity with inlined asm - some more bytes (8 if already in register) for each parameter. But it seems the temporary load/stores on the stack are not so expensive, at least not so expensive that even small inlined asm-routines pay off. Cheers, Gerd
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.