Author: Odd Gunnar Malin
Date: 19:03:16 01/20/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 20, 2003 at 21:03:00, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On January 20, 2003 at 18:37:41, Odd Gunnar Malin wrote: > >>On January 20, 2003 at 17:12:14, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On January 20, 2003 at 15:38:00, Peter Skinner wrote: >>> >>>>I think that if a program is automated is enough to play in the next CCT. If not >>>>then we might have the same result. >>> >>>adding kibitzing requires _one_ line of C code to a program. IS that a big >>>stumbling block??? >>> >>>Or is it just an "excuse"??? >> >>Adding uci/winboard-communication or even talk direct with Blitzin should be >>easy for all, but the commercials had to make a book-manager too that could read >>the book-format. This seems not to be a one days work with bug-testing and all. >> >>Odd Gunnar > > >Not sure what you mean. NO need to kibitz book moves, it is obvious it is a >book move when it is played instantly. Not kibitzing those is a good idea as >who wants all that output in 2 seconds? > >Many didn't kibitz until out of book which was just fine, IMHO. That I mean is if they should use one of the ICC-compatible gui they will miss their book since this is done by the gui. I would guess that they can run their engine from commandline (how else would they make automatic testing of progress etc.), so winboard/uci should be just a few hours work. Odd Gunnar
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.