Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: CCT5, was there something missing?

Author: Sune Fischer

Date: 00:38:35 01/21/03

Go up one level in this thread


On January 20, 2003 at 21:07:22, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On January 20, 2003 at 18:25:29, Sune Fischer wrote:
>
>>On January 20, 2003 at 17:12:14, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>
>>>First, the _point_ was that the programs be operated automatically, rather
>>>than manually.  Ferret met this point.  We discussed the kibitzing issue at
>>>length here, but Bruce was not around and didn't notice it.  He _did_ kibitz
>>>on the second day as he made the changes to his code to do this.
>>>
>>>He didn't strictly follow the rules, I agree.  But the explanation was quite
>>>reasonable and he _did_ fix it.
>>
>>Yes we can forgive Bruce I think, obviously an oversight, although I don't
>>understand why people can't be bothered to _read_ a simple page with the rules,
>>no offence.
>
>Probably once you have done four of them, you suspect number five will be
>about the same.  :)

Or maybe real men don't need to read instructions? :)

-S.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.