Author: Steffen Jakob
Date: 02:19:31 01/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 21, 2003 at 04:34:43, José Carlos wrote: // > Maybe you have a different definition over there. > I've played chess for some years, I've played spanish ch. a couple of times, >I've been champion of my area many times... In my experience as a chess player, >a TN is a N which: > - is played by a strong player > - is played in a "correct" game (meaning that, after the move, there's a good >plan) > - is later repeated by others > > In a word, a TN is a N which proves good. A random N is _never_ considered a >TN. Otherwise, every game would contain a TN. If the TN is refuted years later, was it then still a TN? ;-) Greetings, Steffen.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.