Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 05:10:18 01/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 21, 2003 at 07:46:29, James T. Walker wrote: >Hello Rolf, >I'm sorry but I don't understand your post. I suspect you also did not >understand mine. That is unless you really believe that playing 36 chess >programs 90 games instead of 9 games will always produce the same winner and >therefore the "best/strongest" program. If you believe that then yes we do >disagree. And "that's my final answer." >Jim No, I didn't mean that. I was talking about the differences of two progs. And then I think that after 900 games we could say more than after 90 or 9. It was really trivil what I wrote. Nothing that should get you into problems of understanding. With the 36 chess progs and a tournament this becomes more and more complex and that is another case. Thanks for your clarification, Jim. Regards, Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.