Author: Detlef Pordzik
Date: 15:11:47 09/25/98
Go up one level in this thread
On September 25, 1998 at 01:31:49, Don Dailey wrote: >On September 25, 1998 at 00:03:38, Detlef Pordzik wrote: > >>On September 24, 1998 at 20:27:47, Don Dailey wrote: >> >>> >>>>Did you consider the possibility that Thorsten was the victim of a pre-planned, >>>>private email conspiracy which set out to provoke and then zap him based on his >>>>inevitable "off-topic" response ? >>>> >>>>Steve Blatchford >>> >>>Do you think we are stupid? Of course we considered this. We looked >>>at many angles. We are convinced that Thorsten was partially baited >>>and goaded. The problem is that Thorsten is the easiest one on the >>>group to bait and that in itself caused a lot of problems. >>> >>>- Don >> >>Besides the fact, that I can't figure your answer as polite by no means, I >>partially - must - accept you answer in your proclamation towards the entire NG >>in annother mail > >My answer was not intended to be impolite, I hope Detlef doesn't take >it that way. If so I apologize in advance to him. > >I probably was a little iritated at the question, simply because >we tried so hard on Thorstens behalf, and yet in the end it is >suggested that Thorsten is the victim. The string of offended >members doesn't count and are not important but only Thorsten is. > >>In the highest majority it was, no doubts, TC's own fault. >>But " victims " - my Lord - that's a strong word..... > >Obviously you were not the subject of his attacks. It's pretty easy >for you to say this isn't it? I don't think some of his targets >can brush this off as lightly as you do. > >>if one wants to nail a thing up high, he does it. And the more he tramples on >>it, the more it gets disturbing - kinda experience of life.... >> >>No question, that you didn't make it easy on yourself, you got a defined duty >>from the NG members, and it ain't easy, as I suggest - >>yet, senseless, I really pity this loss and somehow can't prevent the feeling >>of a modern " book burning " - >>even viewing the respectful work of the moderators, a bad feeling remains - >>at least from my side.... >> >>ELVIS > >Join the club. Do you think it was easy for us? > >- Don It's history by now anyway - just like fighting to a mirror. 2 last things : I've personally been a target for TC's attacs for many times;" Saitek vs Novag, CSTal vs ELVIS " :-) I know the man - just as the other affected ones, and it personally didn't mean a thing to me - 'cause he allways came back to normal behaviour. This can't be an advice for common use - sure not - just to clarify your insist, I got some cheap talkin' on this....'cause not affected. Translate me your last sentence ! I don't get the meaning ! " Join the club " - what do you mean here ? " Do you think it was easy for us " - what's that ? An academic question ? Is it really so, that you couldn't read 5 + 6 lines above in my mail, that I very well can feel, that you had a hard time on this decision ? I've noticed similar vocabular in your mail to Steve - now same with me. So be so kind ; gimme an explanation - I'm probably not that good anymore to understand your native language. ELVIS
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.